UBS chair warns subsequent disaster can be in personal markets

Unlock the Editor’s Digest at no cost

The subsequent monetary disaster is prone to be within the “shadow” non-bank lending sector, UBS chair Colm Kelleher has stated, warning that the expansion of evenly regulated personal markets because the 2008 disaster is a “actual trigger for concern”.

Talking at a finance convention in Hong Kong on Tuesday, Kelleher stated he was making the remarks “on the threat of upsetting half the folks within the room, a few of whom are shoppers and rivals”.

Nevertheless, he stated, a big share of monetary property globally “are actually within the non-bank monetary intermediaries, the shadow sector . . . I believe the following disaster when it occurs can be in that sector, it will likely be a fiduciary disaster”.

Personal lenders have emerged as a giant pressure on Wall Avenue over the previous decade, more and more changing banks as a supply of financing for firms, after crisis-era regulation compelled establishments to rein in risk-taking. The biggest personal lenders have raised billions of {dollars} to finance leveraged buyouts and firms’ day-to-day operations.

Kelleher’s feedback prompted a defence of the trade from Marc Rowan, chief government of personal markets behemoth Apollo International Administration, who spoke on a later panel on the identical occasion.

“Whenever you transfer one thing from the banking system to asset administration, you progress it, for probably the most half, from a levered system to an unlevered system,” Rowan stated. He stated such lending “provides robustness to the system”.

Rowan stated Apollo held “immense quantities of liquidity” and he may “barely get the fingerprint ink off my fingers” as a result of his dealings with regulators have been so in depth.

Goldman Sachs chief government David Solomon, who was on the identical panel, joked in response: “You could possibly be part of our world and have extra ink in your fingers in the event you’d like.”

Later on the occasion, Jon Grey, president of Blackstone, which has a big personal lending arm, additionally defended the trade. He stated it was comparatively low threat “if we’re managing cash for a state pension fund and we lend it out on [an] unleveraged foundation”.

Kelleher additionally spoke about his bank’s takeover of Credit score Suisse because it collapsed earlier this 12 months. “It was clear we at UBS didn’t need to do the deal . . . we had our personal technique,” he stated.

However “by October 2022, it was clear Credit score Suisse was a complete falling knife”, he stated, and his financial institution enlisted “the mighty home of Morgan Stanley” to “prepare for this name we didn’t need”.

Credit score Suisse’s collapse “was not about capital; this was about [its] enterprise mannequin and funding”, Kelleher stated. He stated “regulators in Switzerland must be given extra energy to opine on these points” and added that it was “misguided” for regulators to concentrate on the necessity for banks to carry much more capital.

He was talking as UBS unveiled a $785mn quarterly loss, its first in virtually six years, following the takeover of Credit score Suisse.

Christian Stitching, chief government of Deutsche Financial institution, stated the factor that made him “nervous” was the state of capital markets.

“They’ve been extraordinarily resilient,” he stated. “If you consider what’s happening on the earth from a geopolitical standpoint, an inflationary standpoint . . . my greatest concern is there’s yet another geopolitical escalation and markets surrender their calmness and you’ve got a market occasion. We have to keep on alert.”

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles